🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration is no longer a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a privilege that authorities allow or withhold at their discretion. This constitutes the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate when and where protests can take place, with possible prison sentences for those who disobey these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous administrations had already undermined this essential right: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement extensive new authorities, which global rights bodies had condemned as "serious and unjustified restrictions" on civil liberties. Taken together, these progressive assaults on liberty have practically eliminated the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Using Tragedy to Rationalize Suppression

The most recent restrictive measures are being justified by citing last week's heinous antisemitic assault on a Manchester Islamic center. There should be widespread consensus that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, using this horrific incident as a pretext to suppress dissent is not only unrelated to that duty but distorts it.

"When you cannot draw the line at genocide, you likely cannot draw the line at democracy," observed a well-known American author, a statement that rings true for the present administration.

Historical Context of Protest

Reflect on Britain's rich history of protest and direct action against racism and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were branded as radicals in their era, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of minorities.

Present Situation

In the current complex situation, here's what's truly happening: The Israeli government – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have characterized as systematic destruction. Its military actions have led the global justice body to release legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

International popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of citizens think Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a complete ban on weapons exports to the state, and back the detention of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely lost the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now exploiting a despicable anti-Jewish attack to attempt to silence a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems involved in this effort. Ministers have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to continue.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been labeled as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish heritage with the policies of the Israeli state is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The official definition of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly challenged for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a point where police authorities can suggest that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, political figures have declared that recognition of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "complicit" in alleged abuse faced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israel's army killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from 24 months of daily atrocities that have claimed tens of thousands of lives. British politicians and media outlets have barely concealed the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a dangerous threshold by banning a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused activist collective. Thousands of British protesters have been detained, mostly for carrying signs against genocide and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; including a former clergyman and the daughter of a World War II genocide survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's not difficult to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker implied that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the current president described such demonstrations as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to control opposition. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears struggled, suffered and died to secure our liberties. We may ultimately rue how easily we permitted them to slip away.