🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he could survive defeat by Grimsby. Survive an important European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, calling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach took on the executive and appears to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated at his players for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, based on his nine months of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which the club's competitors will now be rightly wary.

A Strategic Clash Over Formation and Philosophy

To illustrate, it was the director who being involved in the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties faced pushback. However, these judgements hold greater authority when delivered by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as him – function at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power Behind the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to adopt analytics and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “will be determined in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in industry and yachting. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Whom else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

A New Football Order: Executives Above Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to join an organization and implement their plan through to completion. But how many businesses have these guys established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to place the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and hire a coach who will adapt their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the food, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, their job has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and secures domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged while the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance in action: the rise of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the system coach and then dismiss them for using too much 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and later bin them for requiring too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.